How the Netherlands can gain influence in the European digital transition

Published on 12 February 2026

The rules governing our digital public administration are to a large extent set at European level. Our research related to the Intergovernmental Data Strategy (IBDS) shows that Dutch public organisations widely participate: at least 252 organisations are active in 82 European forums. This provides a strong starting position, but it does not necessarily translate into strategic influence. Levels of engagement differ between organisations, connections are thin, and coordination across domains does not emerge by itself. As a result, the Netherlands is not yet making optimal use of its position in Europe.

‘There needs to be a vision and a tactic; currently it is every organisation for itself. We have no one who translates strategy into tactics. We lack a coach who gives directions during the match.’

Interviewee on the role of government

Why this matters now

Important decisions are currently being taken in Brussels on the digital building blocks of our public services. These include collaboration without barriers (interoperability), data spaces, AI standards, cloud services and cybersecurity. By actively contributing to the development of standards, we safeguard public values and prevent that systems have to be redesigned at a later stage.

At the same time, we see international technology companies gaining increasing influence in standardisation forums. Without a well organised public counterweight, the agenda can easily shift.

Interactive network map: hover over an organisation for more information and click to view its direct network. Use the legend to show or hide categories. The network consists of organisations connected to the IBDS EU Data Network or the Network of Data Systems (pink), other organisations (blue), and the European bodies they are linked to (black). The size of the nodes indicates the number of connections within the collected data.

Claudio Lazo

‘A relatively small group of public organisations is connected to almost the entire European and international landscape. At the same time, they fulfil very different roles. For example, RVO occupies a different position in the network than RINIS.’

Claudio Lazo, researcher at TNO Vector

The Netherlands in European forums: broadly present, but thinly connected

Our network analysis shows that Dutch organisations are active in many European working groups, expert groups and standardisation forums across many domains. This gives us early insight into new developments and a seat at the table.

However, coherence is lacking. Ministries and sectors such as mobility and healthcare often operate independently. Respondents describe the situation as “every organisation for itself”.

We see this pattern within the IBDS network as well: collaboration is concentrated around a few central hubs, such as the Centre of Excellence for Data Sharing & Cloud (CoE DSC), Forum Standardisation and Geonovum. Thematic clusters (e.g. data spaces, semantics, cybersecurity) are only weakly interconnected. The result is a network that appears large, but is less cohesive as expected based on the numbers.

What holds us back

The low intensity of collaboration has structural causes: limited capacity, loss of knowledge due to staff rotation and reliance on external parties, and mandates that are not always clear. In addition, there is little room for coordination. Without a shared overview and light national coordination, participation often remains reactive and influence unpredictable.

Opportunities for leverage

The Netherlands is strongly involved in European forums around standardisation, such as the Multi-Stakeholder Platform on ICT Standardisation, public private partnerships in digitalisation (e.g. ADRA), and joint initiatives such as the Data Spaces Support Centre (DSSC). This offers opportunities to increase public sector influence, but requires pooling expertise and organising coherence.

Generic EU building blocks for data sharing (e.g. SIMPL, OOTS, SEMIC, EOSC) also provide concrete entry points to link Dutch use cases to European architectures. This delivers visibility, reusable assets (profiles, reference architectures) and faster adoption.

Use case: INSPIRE as a strategic lever for interoperability

INSPIRE, a European framework for geodata, has been implemented in the Netherlands by Geonovum. What began as a legal obligation has evolved into a strategic foundation for interoperability. Through the Extensions methodology, Geonovum connects national needs to European models, enabling the Netherlands to stay ahead of the European data strategy and the Green Deal data space. Thanks to this approach, the Netherlands actively contributes to GreenData4All and plays a central role in the modernisation of INSPIRE and future data spaces.

What this means for public organisations in the Netherlands

A stronger and better connected Dutch position in European forums helps public organisations to:

  • Work with clear and usable standards;
  • Make digital services more reliable and efficient;
  • Make better use of investments in data infrastructure;
  • Reduce dependence on large (foreign) market players.

Three steps towards a stronger Dutch position



1.

Create a shared overview 
Develop an accessible overview of relevant forums, roles, mandates, consultations, deadlines and contact points. For example, IBDS networks could organise the ongoing maintenance of this overview.

2.

Coordinate on a regular basis 
No additional governance layer is required, but structural coordination is. Organise regular moments at which hubs such as IBDS, CoE DSC, Forum Standardisation and Geonovum discuss priorities, align consultation responses and divide tasks.

3.

Invest in structural knowledge building 
Develop a learning pathway on EU frameworks, interoperability and standardisation. This safeguards knowledge and makes Dutch engagement in European regulation more consistent.

Gijs van Houwelingen

‘Our report is a snapshot, not an end point. We now have a compass for follow up research and for strengthening Dutch influence in Brussels on these crucial themes.’

Gijs van Houwelingen, researcher at TNO Vector

Conclusion

Dutch engagement in Europe is broad, but collaboration is thin. As long as there is a lack of overview and clear mandates, Dutch influence will remain less predictable than necessary. By introducing at least light coordination, creating transparency and strengthening coalitions, we can move from fragmented participation to structural influence. In doing so, we remain aligned with the ambitions of the Dutch Digitalisation Strategy.

This research is conducted within the programme Realisatie IBDS, in collaboration with the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations and ICTU. Interested in more TNO research within this programme? See our article on Successful data governance in the public sector.

Meet the authors

Recent articles